The work of art is therefore
only a halt in the becoming
and not a frozen aim on its own.
Definitely agree! Even a finished work of art is not a finished piece, but just a progress. It’s like a photograph of a certain point in our own personal development.
And there’s the matter of when and how to abandon it, recalling Paul Valery’s assertion that “a poem is never finished, only abandoned.”
That’s very true too. Both poetry and paintings drive me nuts because every time I look at an old one I’ve “finished” I want to go back and change it. But you really shouldn’t. It would be like photoshopping an old picture to make it look newer. It just ruins something.
It depends, though. If the work can be improved on, enhanced, expanded, then it deserves the additional attention. And that takes time. There’s something to be said about walking away from the work for an extended period, letting it settle. Horace and Robert Frost talk about that as necessity (echoed by Donald Hall). It’s also nice to have different versions available, when possible (variorum).
Wow maybe they were right. I don’t compare my sporadically created little works of art or writing to anything classic or professional though. I really don’t know much about it. Perhaps it merits some research. I understand what you mean though. I’ve been working on the same painting since November now. I know people who can produce several in a week (but they’re usually not so good).
I see no need to rush things.
I find that especially true for blogging. We can even rewrite history if we want.
Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new posts via email.